|
news - about - search - email - home
dunbar - djma - muir - jmbt - donate walks - events - newsletters - membership - office - links Origins of the JMC Project |
|
|
DJMA/JMC Background... [home] |
|
DJMA/JMC Background... |
| Origins of the JMC Project |
|
First posting about JMC |
A feasibility study is currently being undertaken. Comments, messages of support, suggestions, etc., are encouraged and can be be sent to me.
Duncan Smeed duncan@cs.strath.ac.uk aka jmmci-pilot-request@mailbase.ac.uk
"In April 1988, on the 150th anniversary of John Muir's birth, The John
Muir Trust was publicly launched at meeting in Dunbar, attended by the
President of the Sierra Club, at which the patronage of HRH Prince
Charles was announced as was the news that President Reagan had
declared April 21st to be John Muir Day henceforth.
Graham White, Director of Edinburgh's Environment Centre, and Don
Bracewell, Outdoor Education Tutor in East Lothian, felt that the
young people of Dunbar should be involved in spreading Muir's
philosophy. Pupils of Dunbar Primary School, dressed in early
Victorian costume, posted letters written by them to 160 World Heads
of State explaining the significance of the day and their own
involvement and concern, and relating Muir's life and achievements.
They thanked them for the efforts their nations had made in the past
to protect wild land and wild life and asked what plans there were for
the future.
Replies came from many parts of the world, often written by a Minister
of the Environment. Some were obviously touched that a child in a
small Scottish town was concerned about the efforts they were making
to protect their wild places. Some anticipated a continuing
correspondence; all were pleased to hear about John Muir, some proud
that he was already respected in their countries. Many sent booklets,
reports and leaflets describing their environmental programmes and
also some educational materials. What is striking is the effort that
has been made by some nations with very limited resources.
We have used this material to publicise these efforts. Other groups
may draw attention to the problems, but perhaps we can encourage those
who are facing them by letting them know that we share their concern
and that we want others to know what they are doing.
At the same time perhaps, these particular youngsters will themselves
be made more environmentally aware in sending Muir's message to every
country of the world. We visualise contact with young people of other
nations, joint projects and exchange visits, with Dunbar acting as a
central clearing house, with a bank of regularly updated conservation
material. We plan the establishment of a centre organising and
producing exhibitions, conferences, seminars, publications, films and
public events relating to Muir's work and conservation education
generally.
But perhaps our first task should be to raise the profile of John Muir
in Scotland itself. If you have not read his books, then start now
and make them available to the young people around you. His
perceptive eye, inquiring mind and infectious energy and enthusiasm
should stir not only their own 'natural inherited wildness' but
persuade them to protect that other inherited wildness that continues
to be threatened."
Muir's books, written before the vocabulary of ecology was
developed, are captivating and powerful in their precocious but
practical view of our place in the continuous interaction around
us: "When we try to pick out anything by itself we find it
hitched to everything else in that universe." His wilderness
discoveries, both in the landscape and within himself, began
a powerful social movement whose relevance to our times is
indisputable. His message is not threatening but positive and
glad and therefore one to be propagated. His own adventurous
life makes a fascinating and colourful story which deserves
telling.
We felt that, although such a project would focus on education and conservation, it would also provide a major tourist attraction for visitors and conservationists all over Britain as well as the United States. The scheme was seen very much as a flagship project for the economic regeneration of the town by bringing money, visitors and cultural prestige.
It was assumed that Muir's life would serve as the historical backdrop, but modern conservation issues in Scotland and the rest of the world would be the living and often contentious foreground. The centre would also function as an environmental gateway to East Lothian and the wider Scotland of Torridon, Knoydart or the Cairngorms. It would be a natural education base for the local Ranger Service and, when tourism numbers fell in winter, it would still attract school parties throughout Lothian and Scotland.
Additionally, such a nexus would provide a national shop window for the environmental movement in Scotland - a showcase for conservation agencies such as Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Wildlife Trust, RSPB, Woodland Trust, as well as the East Lothian Wildlife Group or the River Tyne Trust. There would be a rich programme of walks, talks, exhibitions, films, videos and slide-tape presentations from a wide variety of agencies. Scotland lacks any such national focus point for environmental issues at present.
It was at this time that Don Bracewell, studying Blue Circle Industries plc's plans for golfing development at Broxmouth, Dunbar on behalf of Scottish Wildlife Trust (and approving of them), met Nigel Bishop and Kevin Boys of BCI and discussed, informally, the John Muir ideas. They were impressed with the concept and its potential and asked to be kept informed.
In May 1989, through the initiative of Pauline Jaffray of PJ Designs, who acted both for BCI and for the Dunbar Initiative, together with Terry Isles, Director of the John Muir Trust, we took this paper to the Scottish Development Agency and the Scottish Tourist Board. They were enthusiastic and went off to produce some figures. Blue Circle vouched funds for the feasibility study and, through the Dunbar Initiative, East Lothian District Council were invited to become involved. Sadly, once the Council took up the idea (and the funding), we heard nothing more, nor were any conservation bodies or local groups consulted, until October 1991. By then East Lothian's Department of Leisure and Tourism's consultants, The Environment and Development Company, had produced finished studies and reports.
However, the consultants and ELDC had radically altered the original concept and proposed to build a tourist centre, not in Dunbar town, but at Linkfield in the John Muir Country Park itself, adjacent to the vulnerable Tyninghame Estuary SSSI. Moreover, the proposals totally missed the point of of the original idea to create an international centre, which would go far beyond the narrow bounds of a tourist attraction and bring prestige and economic benefit to Dunbar.
It was ironic that those whose expertise, influence and, above all, enthusiasm for the concept of a John Muir Centre in his birthplace could have been harnessed cooperatively in a great enterprise found themselves unwillingly in the unlikely roles of objectors.
The proposed site was just 100 metres from the Tyninghame SSSI with its sand dunes, evolving saltmarsh and important wading bird community. Crucially it is less than a mile from a very sensitive site supporting a List One endangered species - a colony of Little Terns which survive and breed here with some difficulty.
Terry Isles wrote on behalf of JMT on 24/2/93:
"In view of the projected volume of visitors to the Centre, it
is felt inevitable that disturbance and damage will result within
this sensitive conservation area and the result would be an
unacceptable association of the name of John Muir with the
destruction of a nationally important conservation site. It
is hard to understand why no Environmental Impact Assessment has
been carried out, in view of the very detailed work which has
been done on other aspects of the project. The John Muir Country
Park represents such an important conservation resource in
south-east Scotland that every effort should be made to safeguard
its natural qualities for future generations."
Accusations of elitism and zealotry levelled at the objectors by members of ELDC were shown to be very wide of the mark by the support indicated at this meeting by Dunbar traders and citizens and others unassociated with the conservation movement. Many people expressed a wish to be further involved in seeking a way forward to the creation of a worthy centre and it was agreed that a round-table meeting with ELDC, LEEL, SNH and a delegation from this meeting be sought.
Finding a suitable site requires a balance between what is desirable to fulfil all the aims and what are the physical constraints, while providing maximum economic benefit to the town, under the Dunbar Initiative. There is no intrinsic connection between Muir and the Country Park, and Dunbar has many redundant buildings and several empty sites within the town close to public transport. The wild, natural quality of the park can be enjoyed by the visitor for its own sake. The landscape already speaks for itself as it did to Muir in 1893 when he revisited his birthplace and wrote to his wife Louie:
"I see glacial studies all around.... Last night I took a walk
along the shore on the rocks where I played as a boy. The waves
made a grand show, breaking in sheets and sheaves of foam and
granted songs - the same old songs they sang to me in my
childhood and I seemed a boy again and all the long eventful
years in America were forgotten while I was filled with that
glorious ocean psalm."
For all other catering, residential and larger-scale meeting purposes Dunbar's own existing facilities should be utilised to spread the economic benefit. They might be stimulated to respond to an increasing demand as would other tourist-related enterprises.
It would:
Later that month (December 1993) Terry Isles and a number of Trustees of the John Muir Trust met again with senior District Councillors who indicated the would welcome suggestions for an alternative proposal.
On 15/2/94, ELDC announced that its planning application for Linkfield had been withdrawn. Reasons given were that SNH had refused to withdraw its objections and that Tyninghame Estate Trustees had placed an unrealistic value in Hedderwick Plantation which the Council had included in their plans and therefore would have needed to purchase.
The 60 people attending the meeting were invited to form a Steering Group to consider the proposals for a Feasibility Study, a first draft of which was before them. Over 30 people put their names forward. At a second meeting on 28/4/94, it was agreed that a more manageable Executive Committee of seven would be elected. They, together with members of JMT I&E Committee, would promote the scheme, consider the form and content of the proposal and seek funding for the Feasibility Study. A further suggestion that a new local organisation with charitable status be formed, to give the project some roots and an identity, would be investigated. The broader Steering Group would meet regularly meantime. The involvement of JMT was considered vital to the success of the project. The executive committee, drawn from a wide spectrum of local interest is: